Calendar

May 2013
SuMoTuWeThFrSa
1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031

Category Archives

  • None

Tag Cloud

blog.uucmtka.org

Ann Reed Concert - January 26, 2013

What a beautiful concert tonight in our sanctuary from Ann Reed! It was a full house for great music.  For any of you who don't know her, or weren't there tonight, check out her website to learn more.

Unfortunately, my wife Heidi was sick tonight and stayed home, but Verlyn, my father-in-law (Heidi's dad) went with me.  We have a kinship through many things, and one of them is folk music.  It was great to sit with him tonight and enjoy the music.

Of course other people had their own experience tonight.  As for myself, I traveled to many places.  Ann Reed took me to the State Fair, to northern Minneota, to election night, and to a women's music festival in Michigan.  And, inspired by those travels, I came home with four of her CDs!  (She actually gave me one of them - "Heroes: A Celebration of Women Who Changed History and Changed Our Lives" - because I spoke with her before the concert about how I used to work with foster teenagers on work projects in Idaho in the early 1990s, and around the campfire I would sing to them Ann Reed's song, "Heroes")

I also traveled to a few other places she didn't intend, but probably would not be surprised about if she heard.  My mom was also a UU minister, and served the congregation in Davenport, Iowa, from 1988-2000.  She was also a big Ann Reed fan.  And she died just a month ago, on December 28.  So tonight, with the help of Ann Reed's music, I also visited with my mom for a while.  And I visited with many people in Davenport, including the all-female choir, Hersong, which my mom also loved.  In fact, in one of the sympathy cards I received from a woman in the Davenport congregation, she wrote about how she remembered my mom spontaneously (and my mom was NOT usually spontaneous!) getting up in the middle of the song, "Big-Legged Woman" and dancing down the aisle! (and my mom was also NOT a dancer!).

My mom was, in some ways, a complicated woman.  And, in some ways, I have very mixed feelings about her.  But I loved hearing about how tickled someone was about one of my mom's small acts of spontaneity.  And I loved thinking more again about the people in Davenport. Yes, there were ways my mom did not see me, or did not relate to me in ways I needed and found valuable, but there are many other ways she was definitely one of Ann Reed's "Heroes" to me.

And all of this caused me to circle 'round and think about the people at UUCM.

I sometimes wonder how you at UUCM see me.  I wonder if you think I am more rigid like my mother, or if you feel I am more easy-going, like I like to see myself. Or something else.  In any case, though, tonight's concert also got me thinking about how much I love UUCM and the people who are here.  I began again to feel - as I often do - a sense of warmth about this congregation, radiating outward from where I sat to include everyone in the church.  And I realized, without bashfulness or chagrin, it was a feeling of love. 

I felt a sense of priviledge - that I get to be here, I get to be the minister of this congregation in this time. I felt a sense of wonder - of how many people it takes to arrange, plan, set up, and take down beautiful events like this (THANK YOU Bill Tregaskis and Joyce Lyons!), and how wonderful and rare it is to have a few moments to sit together, basking in that moment of beauty.  And I felt love. I felt this great big encompassing love.  I love being here. I love that I've been here for five and a half years, and I love that it looks like I'll be here for many years to come...and I love that we continue to be in relationship, day after day, week after week, year after year.

What an amazing concert, that it could take one person to so many places!





Obituary for Charlotte Justice Saleska

There is always too much to say.  Always more than can be written in a simple obituary.  Every time a minister in the Unitarian Universalist Association dies, though, I get a notice about their death, with a more extensive obituary than can usually be included in the local paper or website.  The UUA obituary always begins with the phrase, "The Ministries and Faith Development Staff offers our condolences to the family and colleagues of the Reverend...."  This time, the obituary is for my mom, the Reverend Charlotte Justice Saleska.  Though there will always be more to say, and though I'll say more and process more in the days and months to come - here, for now, is the UUA obituary for my mom.  Much of it - particularly the factual pieces - was written by UUA staff, but I also added some personal notes and memories for this blog post.

- Kent Hemmen Saleska

----------------------------------------------------


CHARLOTTE JUSTICE SALESKA (1935-2012)

The Ministries and Faith Development staff offers our condolences to the family and colleagues of the Rev. Charlotte Justice Saleska who, after being diagnosed with Alzheimer’s disease in 2003, died on December 28, 2012. She was 77 years old.

Rev. Saleska was born in Marion, IN on August 16, 1935 to Olive (Heel) and E.E. Justice. She graduated with a Bachelor of Arts from Taylor University in 1957. She then went on to attain a Master of Arts from Hunter College in 1964. Finally, in 1988, she earned both a Master of Arts in Religious Studies from the University of Chicago Divinity School and a Master of Divinity from Meadville Lombard Theological School.  As a student at Meadville Lombard, she helped create and implement the first women’s studies course at the seminary, and led a call for the school to hire female professors to the all-male faculty.

Rev. Saleska was ordained on June 6, 1988. She was first called to serve the Unitarian Universalist Congregation of the Quad Cities in Davenport, IA (and was the first and only female settled minister there) from 1988-2000. She then went on to serve as interim minister at the First Universalist Unitarian Church of Wausau, WI from 2000-2001. She also served as interim minister at the Unitarian Universalist Church of Tampa, FL from 2001-2002. In 2000, she was bestowed with the honor of Minister Emeritus of the Unitarian Universalist Congregation of the Quad Cities.

Rev. Saleska brought her diverse background to her work as a minister. She was a social worker at Head Start Families in Milwaukee, WI from 1968-1975. From 1975-1980, she was the sole coordinator of the Inter-Urban Health Careers program affiliated with several Milwaukee area school districts. While her husband, the Rev. Charles Saleska, was serving the Unitarian Universalist Fellowship of Gainesville, FL, she served as the Fellowship’s Director of Religious Education from 1983-1985. During that time she also taught high school honors English literature to juniors and seniors, first at Dixie County High School near the Gulf of Mexico, and then at Alachua County High School.  When her husband was diagnosed with a terminal illness in 1983, her women’s group encouraged her to follow her call to ministry, and in 1985, at the age of 50, she entered Meadville Lombard.

During her tenure at the Unitarian Universalist Congregation of the Quad Cities, she formed the Interfaith Theological Symposiums with Edwards Congregational United Church of Christ and Temple Emanuel, both also located in Davenport, IA. Conveying a strong interest in social issues, Rev. Saleska worked at length with women's issues groups and abortion rights groups, and worked diligently as part of an interfaith clergy group to bring a Planned Parenthood clinic to the Quad Cities.  Rev. Saleska also helped guide the church on a building expansion project that, for the first time, created more classroom space and meeting space for the congregation.

Rev. Saleska was a passionate advocate for women’s issues, and for claiming and reclaiming the story and role of women in religion and in human society.  Her passion originated in the home as she guided and taught her two sons to respect, speak out, and feel compassion for women and women’s issues; and expanded later to include her engagement in seminary, social justice, and ministry.  She also loved deep discussions of any kind, especially book discussion groups and movie discussions.  Because of her background in English literature and her love for Shakespeare, she was able to quickly recall and expound on literary references, metaphors and poems, and gave voice to them in her sermons and discussions.  Arising from her childhood on an Indiana farm, she loved to garden in her younger adult years, and in later years her house was full of green and growing plants of many kinds and varieties.  Rev. Saleska also loved to travel, and during her years of ministry she took trips to Transylvania, Germany, France, and Italy – and when she could, she also traveled to Chicago and New York to visit friends and attend the theater.  One of her favorite activities before and after retirement was to drive to Spring Green, Wisconsin, to meet her sister Carol and Carol’s husband Dave to attend Shakespeare plays by the American Players Theater.

Rev. Saleska is survived by her sisters, Carol Jones and Carmen Wilks; brothers, Warren Justice and Sam Justice; son, Scott Saleska, his wife, Kirsten Engel and their daughter, Helene; son, Kent Saleska, his wife, Heidi Saleska, and their children, Parker and Mirek.  Her husband, the Rev. Charles Saleska, died at age 55 in February 1991.

----------------------- 

At this point, we are hoping to have a memorial service for my mom sometime in March in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, where I grew up for the first 14 years of my life, and where my family has long-time roots.  That planning, though, has yet to be finalized, depending on the availability of the church we want to use, and on the availability of the minister we get to officiate.

So much to plan.  So much to remember.  So much sadness and so much to celebrate.








Getting the Call about Mom

It was a call I'd been expecting for a couple years.  It's just that it didn't happen the way I thought it would.

The weekend after Christmas, my family and I planned to visit our extended family and friends who live in the Milwaukee area.  My son Parker had a mini-theater camp at Stages Theater in Hopkins on Wednesday, Thursday, and Friday mornings, and we planned to leave after his class on Friday.  So Friday morning, Heidi and I were running around the house trying to get packed, I was hurriedly completing a few emails for church, and we pretended to clean a little at the same time, since my brother and his family would be visiting for a few days over New Year's as soon as we returned.

My cell phone rang - a call from Arizona.  I assumed it was my brother.  Instead it was from my mom's Alzheimer's Senior Living unit where she lived.

"Mr. Saleska?"

"Yes. This is me."

"Mr. Saleska, I'm calling to let you know that your mother passed away at 8:15 this morning.  I am so sorry for your loss."

The changing of gears at that moment is like ramming the gear handle into first gear without the use of a clutch.  A travel schedule to keep, and miles to go before we sleep, and yet the need for a breath, to learn a little more of what happened, to hear details as though that will help with the emotion, and to hang up trying to figure out what to say and do next.

During the call Heidi came over and I mouthed the words to her about my mom, and she started to cry too and gave me a hug.

Later, I sat on the floor and called over Mirek, my three year old, to tell her what had happened.

"Do you remember Grandma Charlotte?" I asked.  It was 13 months ago, over Thanksgiving 2011 when we last saw her in Arizona.

"Yes," she said and nodded.

"Well, I just got a call telling me that Grandma Charlotte died this morning."

Mirek brightened up a little. "You mean that place where we ran around?  And where we played on the floor in the corner?"

"Yes, that's the place where my mom lived."

"And then you fed her and gave her juice!" Mirek said with enthusiasm.

"Yes. You remember that, huh?  Yes.  That was the place.  And they called me this morning to tell me that Grandma Charlotte died."

"Is that why you are crying?"

"Yes, that is why I am crying."

I gave Mirek a big hug and rocked back and forth on the floor as she played with a little toy in her hands.  "I love you, Mirek."

"I love you, too, Daddy."

We got up, and I gave Heidi a hug, and the rest of the morning was spent a little in a daze.  We had suitcases to pack, more people to call, more emails to send.

*****

My mom was diagnosed with Alzheimer's in November 2003, when she was 68. In 2008 we moved her from her retirement living center in Milwaukee down to an Alzheimer's care unit in Tucson, Arizona, where my brother lives.  Three years ago she was still talking and mobile, even though she didn't always know who we were.  And I even got some nice photos of her holding Mirek at eight months old, and Parker at three years old.

We saw her again at Thanksgiving 2011, and she had changed drastically.  She was in her bed every time we visited except for the last day, when we arrived to see her sitting up, but slumped over a bit in the central communal room of the cottage. That's the visit where I sat knee-to-knee with her and fed her lunch while the kids played with toys in the corner.

I thought she'd only live a few months more at that time.  That's why I had planned for the Mother's Day service at UUCM in May 2012 to be a bit of a tribute to her, using a large portion of a sermon she gave years ago about her growing up years in Indiana.  But she lived on for another year.

The good part about this news of my mother's death was that our travel plans to Milwaukee included a visit with one of my mom's sisters, and one of my dad's sisters, and a long-time family friend.  It was good to be with family that weekend, with people who knew my mom for all or most of her life, and me for all my life. Even when we weren't talking specifically about my mom, it was so good just to be held in the visit with that longtime familiarity and love: sitting at my Aunt Carol and Uncle Dave's kitchen table with a glass of wine, talking all night just like my mom and dad used to do with them; sitting around the living room at my Aunt Dorene's place, grazing on Christmas cookies of all shapes and colors all afternoon while we talked and my children played with the same old Legos and blocks I had played with when I was six and eight and ten; and then sledding with our good friend Kermit and his family, a man who grew up with my brother and me as one of the "kids" in our liberal American Baptist Church youth group.  

One of the best memories I have of my mom is of her reading to our family. Back in the "old days" when I was a kid, when we didn't have air conditioning or video games or cell phones (and back when I had to walk barefoot to school in the snow uphill - both ways), I especially remember a family road trip out to the Badlands and Black Hills of South Dakota.  On the way, in the heat of the summer with the windows of the Buick Skylark rolled down and the wing windows angled in for maximum air flow, my mom read us a biography of Wild Bill Hickok.

My mom brought that old story to life. Wild Bill Hickok began his adventures in Lockport, Illinois, where my cousins lived - so I knew that place well. And then as we travelled west, we stopped at various historic markers that mentioned his life, and then we visited Deadwood, South Dakota, where he died and was buried. It was amazing, in one trip, to first learn about the life span of a man, and then to actually know and see the roads and towns where he lived, travelled and died. A book had never felt so alive to me before.

I remember my mom, sitting in the front passenger seat turned sideways, and reading the story to my dad in the driver's seat, and to my brother and me in the back seat.  I remember that she had to read loud to be heard over the rush of incoming wind, and occasionally stopping to pour some coffee from the thermos at her feet into a cup to water her throat.  And sometimes, even though we would plead for her to "Read! Read!" when she paused, she'd have to stop to rest her voice so she wouldn't go hoarse.  And then we'd have to settle for playing road bingo or finding the alphabet on road signs.

Last weekend, on my family's trip to Milwaukee and back, I sat in the front passenger seat.  Heidi gets motion sickness when she reads in a moving car, so when we travel, I'm often the one in the passenger seat.  Our family was in the middle of the second "Little House" book.  So I picked up "Little House on the Prairie," turned sideways in the front seat, and through the hours, I read chapter after chapter of Laura's adventures on the Kansas plain.  This time, though, the car windows were rolled up and the heat was on, so I didn't have to tear up my throat.  Every time I paused, though, even for a drink of my Diet Coke, the kids would get impatient and shout, "Read! Read!"

Thank you for the gift, mom.  Despite our difficulties and so many challenges together, thank you for so many gifts.  It was good to have you on our trip again.







Set in Stone - by Victoria Safford

Here's a good reading for the end of the year, from the Reverend Victoria Safford (I also posted this on the UUCM Facebook page as well):

SET IN STONE
By Victoria Safford
From Walking Toward Morning

In a cemetery once, an old one in New England, I found a strangely soothing epitaph.  The name of the deceased and her dates had been scoured away by wind and rain, but there was a carving of a tree with roots and branches…and among them the words, “She attended well and faithfully to a few worthy things.”  At first this seemed to me a little meager, a little stingy on the part of her survivors, but I wrote it down and have thought about it since, and now I can’t imagine a more proud or satisfying legacy.

“She attended well and faithfully to a few worthy things.”

Every day I stand in danger of being struck by lightning and having the obituary in the local paper say, for all the world to see, “She attended frantically and ineffectually to a great many unimportant, meaningless details.”

How do you want your obituary to read?

“He got all the dishes washed and dried before playing with his children in the evening.”

“She balanced her checkbook with meticulous precision and never missed a day of work – missed a lot of sunsets, missed a lot of love, missed a lot of risk, missed a lot – but her money was in order.”

“She answered all her calls, all her email, all her voice mail, but along the way she forgot to answer the call to service and compassion, and forgiveness, first and foremost of herself.”

“He gave and forgave sparingly, without radical intention, without passion or conviction.”

“She could not, or would not, hear the calling of her heart.”

How will it read, how does it read, and if you had to name a few worthy things to which you attend well and faithfully, what, I wonder, would they be?




Moving Forward - Finally? Finally!

I am not quite stunned, but I'm also feeling as though I should pinch myself to make sure this is real.

I write this upon my return from the Wayzata City Council meeting this evening. Tonight, according to the settlement we agreed to with the city in Federal Court a year ago (and then subsequently took 10 months to hash out details), the City of Wayzata officially approved our PUD (planned unit development) application, which will allow us to build our new church at 2030 Wayzata Blvd!

Two and a half years after we filed suit against the city in Federal Court, four years after the city's denial of our request for rezoning in 2008, five years since we had our "Phase I" capital campaign, and seven years (before my time here) since UUCM put together the Relocation Task Force to look at potential locations for a potential new building, we no longer have to wait for the next congregational vote, or the next legal development, or the next round of negotiations, or the next application process.  With the city's approval tonight that fulfilled the terms of our legal settlement, we as a congregation will be able to move forward, under our own steam!  This means we can begin working together as a congregation to make our dreams a reality!

It has been a long and exhausting road.  Though I can hardly believe it, this is real!

I want to give a great big THANK YOU to our legal team.  First I want to thank Sam Diehl, our attorney from Gray, Plant, Mooty in Minneapolis, who has been working tirelessly for us on a pro bono/contingency basis for us for the past three years - and even missed his daughter's Christmas concert tonight (among many family events he missed over the past three years).  He has put hundreds and hundreds of hours into this case for us (as well as others at his law firm), and has impressed our legal team and me.  I also want to thank the members of the legal team from our church, the people who have worked diligently with Sam, and with the UUCM Board every step of the way to communicate and ensure our best interests: Bob and Christy Dachelet, Bill McKnight, Kate Flom, and Alison Albrecht.  The next time any of you from our congregation see any of these folks, please be sure to give them a huge THANK YOU, too!

Through the Board's delegation, I will be organizing various groups over the coming months to work on this new building project.  If you, or anyone you know in the church is interested in participating, please be sure to let me know.

There are MANY things to consider as we move forward, so please bring your eagerness, excitement, AND patience!  I am in close communication with Wynne Yelland, our lead architect from LOCUS Architects, and I am consulting with other UU ministers and members, particularly locally at White Bear and Unity in St. Paul, to learn from their wisdom during their construction projects, about how best we can move forward. We will likely not have the next phase of our capital campaign for at least a year, because we need time to celebrate first - and then lay a foundation of dreaming, visioning, planning and organizing.

I will be in communication about more details soon (probably in January), but for now, I wanted to share this joyful news that we will finally be able to move forward with our dream of building a new church, a church that not only meets our congregation's needs, but serves the community as well!

Moving in Faith,
-Kent







Talking to my Son about Violence

On Monday I walked my six-year-old son to school for the first time since Friday's shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Connecticut.  I first heard the news in my church office on Friday, as I was preparing a sermon for Sunday. In the wake of the news, I scrapped the originally planned sermon, and wrote a new one titled, "In the Bleak Midwinter," the blog post immediately prior to this one.

All weekend I wondered whether or not to tell my son about the shooting, and if I did, what I would say.  He is a kindergartener this year.  He is 3 1/2 months into his school career.  He is the same age as the 20 children who were killed in Sandy Hook.

My wife and I are not ones to shy away from difficult topics. We've had many conversations so far about the existence of Santa Claus (we've told him there isn't a "real" one, but that the stories are wonderful and kindness and generosity are even better - and this year, for the first time, my son sat on a Santa's lap and told him what he wanted for Christmas. And I was very OK with that), about body parts and sex and where babies come from, about race and racism, about people who are gay and lesbian (we have several in our church) and how the most important thing is love and that people ought to be able to marry who they love, no matter if they are the same sex or an opposite sex.

We've talked about violence a little bit, too.  This December I had the DVD of "Joyeux Noel" ("Merry Christmas") laying out on a table after watching it. It is the movie about the Christmas Eve armistice in the trenches during World War I.  The back cover shows an officer shouting at his troops, and lots of guns and bayonets surrounding him.  When he saw the DVD cover, my son asked what the movie was about. I told him it was about a war a hundred years ago, and how the men fighting it were able to stop fighting for a day and learn that the people on the other side were real people too.  He knows my wife and I don't care for guns, but I also told him that sometimes I watch movies like that not because I want to be there in a war, but because I want to know a little more what it is like so maybe I can help stop another one in the future.

But that was about "war" in general, about "violence" in the abstract.  What was I going to say to him - what could I say to him - about Friday's shooting?

His school was very good, and sent a letter home on Friday, and then emailed out that letter over the weekend to all parents.  We also got emails from the principal and from the school district.  All of the letters were very positive, very compassionate, and very supportive.  The letters and info were very good, but one line from one letter kept gnawing at me.  Be mindful of their developmental age, it said. Make time to talk with your children, it said.  And then came the line, "Remember if you do not talk to your children about this incident someone else will."

This is pretty much the line of reasoning we've used when talking with him about race, sex, and love and marriage.  But this time, to be truthful and honest with him as we have been about other topics, was I going to tell him that someone could walk into his school, into his classroom, and start shooting up his room?

I couldn't bear to talk to him about it like that.  And I came to feel that would be bordering on abusive rather than being helpful and caring.  So we didn't talk about it at all over the weekend.  And it was a good, normal, full weekend.

But then came today, and I had to walk him to school, and I kept wondering if he would hear something from a teacher or from one of the other kids.  So as we walked, I held his hand.  About a block from our house I said, "Parker, I love doing things with you."

"I love doing things with you, too, daddy," he said, as he stomped through some deep snow.

"Sometimes, though, I think about all the things going on in the world.  Some of those things are really sad..." I began.

"You mean, like wars?" he said.

"Yeah, like wars.  And sometimes I get really caught up thinking about those things, and even though I love being with you, I don't always pay attention to you the way I want to.  We people can do so many wonderful, lovely things. And then sometimes, we get guns and get into fights and we can be really, really mean to each other.  And that makes me sad."

"Daddy, you know what?" he said.  "When I grow up, I'm going to make signs that say, 'No Guns Allowed,' and I'm going to put them up all over the world.  And that will make people stop fighting."  He picked up a chunk of snow and began licking it.

I smiled and said, "That's good, Parker. I think that could help. And you know what? That's part of why I became a minister. I wanted to help people learn how not to fight so much, too."

We walked in silence for a little bit, still holding hands.  We came to a corner, looked for cars, stepped over a snowbank and crossed the street.

On the other side I said, "Sometimes, though, people have guns."

"Who has guns?"

"Well, you know, some people use guns to go hunting."

"Oh yeah."

"And you know, police carry guns."

A little surprised, he asked, "Why do police carry guns?"

"That's a really good question, Parker.  They usually don't use them.  But sometimes there are people who are doing things they're not supposed to, and sometimes those people have guns, too. The police are trained how to use their guns, but they are also trained how not to use them. They really try not to use them, and they only use them when things get really bad."

"But then they shoot someone?"

I took a deep breath.  "Yeah. Sometimes. Sometimes somebody shoots someone."

We walked on a little more.  By now we were close to the school.  It is only two long blocks up and four short blocks over. 

"Parker," I said, as we crossed the final street, "I want you to know that if you are ever scared about anything that happens, or if you hear about anything scary from someone else, that you can always come to me or mommy to talk about it."

"Yeah," he said casually. "I know."

"Do you feel like you can do that?"

"Uh-huh." 

"Good.  I'm glad to hear that."

We walked in silence a little more.  And then I said, "I wish people could love each other more.  I wish a lot of things.  But usually the things we wish for only happen when we do something to make them happen."

"Daddy, you know what?"

"What?"

"I can't wait. Today after class I get to take home the fish!"

He let me know the serious talk was over.  It was time to move on to more important things.





In the Bleak Midwinter - sermon

This is the sermon I gave yesterday, on Sunday, December 16, in response to the shootings at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newton, CT, on December 14.  I'll post it soon on the "sermon" page of the church website, but for now, it will be my blog post.
-KHS 


IN THE BLEAK MIDWINTER
A response to the Sandy Hook Elementary School shootings, December 14, 2012
Reverend Kent Hemmen Saleska
UU Church of Minnetonka
December 16, 2012

READING: Matthew 2:12-18

Having been warned in a dream not to go back to Herod, [the Magi] returned to their country by another route.

When they had gone, an angel of the Lord appeared to Joseph in a dream.  “Get up,” he said, “take the child and his mother and escape to Egypt. Stay there until I tell you, for Herod is going to search for the child to kill him.”  So he got up, took the child and his mother during the night and left for Egypt, where he stayed until the death of Herod. And so was fulfilled what the Lord had said through the prophet: “Out of Egypt I called my son.”

When Herod realized that he had been outwitted by the Magi, he was furious, and he gave orders to kill all the boys in Bethlehem and its vicinity who were two years old and under, in accordance with the time he had learned from the Magi.  Then what was said through the prophet Jeremiah was fulfilled:

“A voice is heard in Ramah,
    weeping and great mourning,
Rachel weeping for her children
    and refusing to be comforted,
    because they are no more.”


In the Bleak Midwinter
Reverend Kent Hemmen Saleska

    I am tired.  I am sick and tired.  I am sick and tired and angry of violence in America, of violence in the world.  I am angry at a shooter, I am angry at gun manufacturers, I am angry at the gun lobby, I am angry at politicians who defend and collude with the gun lobby.  In this hour, in the aftermath of this tragedy, I am angry and in anguish like Habukkuk in ancient Hebrew Scriptures who laments:

How long, Lord, must I call for help,
    but you do not listen?
Or cry out to you, “Violence!”
    but you do not save?
Why do you make me look at injustice?
    Why do you tolerate wrongdoing?
Destruction and violence are before me;
    there is strife, and conflict abounds.
Therefore the law is paralyzed,
    and justice never prevails.
The wicked hem in the righteous,
    so that justice is perverted.

The perversion of justice shows up so many places in our culture.  I am angry that some of our best computer minds are being used to create ever newer and more complicated and more realistic video games where the players, many of whom are children, rack up more points the more people they kill.  I am angry that violence is both glorified and deemed to be more appropriate to show on television and in the movies than naked bodies making love.  I am angry that access to guns is easier and more available in this country than is access to health care.  I am angry that the National Rifle Association continues to defend their gun manufacturers and their bloodlust with the childishly irresponsible mantra, “guns don’t kill people, people kill people.”  And I am angry that so many people and so many politicians defend that mantra as well.

I am angry that people like former governor Mike Huckabee get to go on national television and say that we have so much violence in our schools because we have systematically removed God from our schools, and that as a result, we shouldn’t be surprised that our schools would become places of carnage.  These outrageously insensitive words are not just cruel and false, they also victimize the families of the dead with a second round of verbal and emotional violence.

            In Friday’s shooting, it was reported that two of the guns found were a Sig Sauer pistol and a Glock pistol.  The slogan for the Sig Sauer gun is: “When it counts.”  The slogan for the Glock gun is, “the confidence to live your life.”  So I am left to wonder what counted at Sandy Hook Elementary School, and what unfathomable form of confidence did the shooter need to have when he went there?

And of course, ultimately, I am so angry and so saddened by the deaths of 28 people, most of whom were children.  I can’t imagine what it must be like to wait in a holding area not knowing the fate of your child.  I can’t imagine what it must be like to wake up this second morning since Friday to once more be reminded that your nightmare continues whether you are sleeping or waking.  13 years ago I worked with teenagers and opened the paper to read about Columbine.  I just sat at the breakfast table sobbing.  More than a decade later I have a son in kindergarten, and on Friday, as I kept turning to my computer in my church office to read and hear updates about the kindergarteners in Sandy Hook Elementary School, I had a similar reaction.  I feel like Rachel, weeping for her children and refusing to be comforted because her children were no more. So that we do not just remember the shooter, we need to remember the children and adults.  For each person – child and adult – I have a candle here.  If you feel comfortable, I invite anyone to come forward and (as Greg plays the music for “O come, O come, Emmanuel” ) light a candle in memory as I read off the names of the people who were lost on Friday: 

Charlotte Bacon, 6
Daniel Barden, 7
Rachel Davino, 29
Olivia Engel, 6
Josephine Gay, 7
Ana Marquez-Greene, 6
Dylan Hockley, 6
Dawn Hochsprung, 47
Madeleine Hsu, 6
Catherine Hubbard, 6
Chase Kowalski, 7
Nancy Lanza, 52
Adam Lanza, 20
Jesse Lewis, 6
James Mattioli, 6
Grace McDonnell, 7
Anne Marie Murphy, 52
Emilie Parker, 6
Jack Pinto, 6
Noah Pozner, 6
Caroline Previdi, 6
Jessica Rekos, 6
Avielle Richman, 6
Lauren Rousseau, 30
Mary Sherlach, 56
Victoria Soto, 27
Benjamin Wheeler, 6
Allison Wyatt, 6

    I am so, so angry, and I am so, so full of anguish.  I am almost at a loss, and I struggle mightily to figure out what to say or do next.  Sitting in my office on Friday listening to the news reports, I suddenly felt I could no longer preach what I had planned to preach.

This afternoon many of us here in our church are involved in the radio play production of the “Miracle on 34th Street.”  Each December I give a sermon that is a letter to a Christmas character.  This year, partly because it’s a character in our show, and partly because I have not yet written a letter sermon to a female character, I wanted to write this year’s letter sermon to Doris Walker, the divorced single mother of the story who is trying to raise her child in the best way she knows how: with as much realism and as few illusions as possible.

I was looking forward to writing that sermon.  A divorced single mother in the 1940s was highly unusual.  Not only is Doris Walker not a sad character deserving our pity or a caricatured character easily dismissed, she is strong and loving.  She wants to raise her daughter in a way that will prevent her daughter from suffering the pain of shattered illusions, and the resulting anger and resentment that inevitably follow.

Sitting in my office on Friday, I felt I couldn’t write that letter sermon.  Instead, I felt the need to somehow address the tragedy at Sandy Hook Elementary School.  Yet as I wrote this sermon and participated in the rehearsal for the show yesterday, I couldn’t help but identify the similarities in Doris Walker’s conflicted feelings about raising a vulnerable child in a world full of pain and disillusionment.

In the midst of my own anger, I am reminded that I can get just as angry as the next person – and that if I let it, I can let my anger turn into rage.  And if I allow my self-righteousness and rage to run amuck, then I create defensive walls, attempting to protect my own pain by directing anger at others.  As a result, I develop the capacity to inflict the kind of violence I normally condemn.  This is where I need my religion, my faith, a faith bound together and emerging from both Christianity and Judaism, to prevent the emergence of rampant anger.

Two thousand years ago, much of the Mediterranean world was occupied and oppressed by Rome.  The people of that time in particular sought a savior, someone who would throw off their oppressors and allow them to be free once more.  I believe we are living under similar oppression today – only this time, it is an oppression of the spirit.  The heavy hand of empire is upon us, an empire of spiritual emptiness that lures us into fear, reactivity, consumerism and addiction.

“Your body is so ugly,” says the emptiness, “that the only way you can be beautiful, or even acceptable, is to lose weight if you are fat, gain weight if you are skinny, straighten your hair if it is wavy, curl your hair if it is straight, dye your hair if it is grey.  And since these efforts will never be enough,” says the emptiness, “spend even more time and money and emotion on these unattainable efforts.”

“Your life is so empty,” says the emptiness, “that the only way you can fill it is with more toys, bigger houses, smaller phones, more pills, more alcohol, more sex, more adrenaline rushes.  If you are not happy,” says the emptiness, “then watch more TV, play more video games, drink more beer, get more and more angry and point your finger at someone else as the cause of your unhappiness.”

“The world is such a scary place,” says the emptiness, “that the only way you can be safe is to buy a gun.  And if you don’t feel safe buying one gun,” says the emptiness, “then go buy another gun.”

In the great empire of emptiness, the forces of fear become so powerful and dissonant that they scream for no restrictions whatsoever because for them the protection of gun ownership, the so-called “freedom” of gun ownership, is more important than healthcare, or the education or the protection of our children.  In this Orwellian cacophony, I can almost hear the doublespeak emerging that stops calling them “killing sprees” and instead, begins to call them “freedom sprees.”

I don’t want to live in a world like that.  Do you?  I don’t want to live in a world where doublespeak trumps common sense, where a lie repeated often enough becomes a truth.  Do you?  From my faith, I need to hear the call of deep peace and profound love cut through this nonsense.  It will not help to turn over the responsibility of raising my children by blaming the video game industry, or blaming Hollywood, or even by blaming heartless politicians or inadequate gun laws.  In the bleak midwinter, when everything is gray and rainy and foggy, the future is not clear.  Definition is difficult to determine between near and far, between up and down, between danger and safety.  So in the bleak midwinter, in the fog of our anger and pain, in the mists of our desire for retaliation and blame, when it seems we’ve lost our moral compass and our sense of direction is out of whack, we call for the birth of a savior.  We sing, “O Come, O Come Emmanuel.”

“Emmanuel” means “God with us.”  When I talk about a “savior,” though, I’m not necessarily talking about God, or a god, or any external supernatural being coming to perform magic on us.  I’m talking about how we discover our brilliance and share it with the world.   I’m talking about how we dig deep to find our light that will give us the strength to overthrow the oppression of emptiness, and then walk together, with one another, as images of The Holy for one another, to bring forth that light to live our lives in balance and wholeness.  As the song says:

O come, O come Emmanuel
and with your captive children dwell.
Give comfort to all exiles here,
and to the aching heart bid cheer.
Rejoice! Rejoice! Emmanuel shall come within
as Love to dwell.

   Perhaps this is when, like Doris Walker, we begin to rebuild our faith, or as she says, “Faith is believing in things when common sense tells you not to.”  This is when we call upon our faith, and on each other, to help us bond together to say to the forces of emptiness that we will not succumb to that lure of fear.  This is when we need to hear once again about the peace of beating our swords into ploughshares; about how faith, hope and love endure, but the greatest of the three is love; about the inherent worth of each person; and how we humans and nature and all the universe are intertwined and interdependent. 

In the words of our opening song, “In the bleak midwinter, in this world of pain, where our hearts are open, love is born again.”

In the face of unspeakable tragedy, let us not become numb, but remain open.  May we remember that however we may name or not name God, compassion and love always show up only in the way we show up.  May we remember that however we may name or not name God, our hands are the hands that reshape the world, call on our politicians to draft laws of peace, and work to prevent violence in our lives.  May we find ways to hold one another with grace, and to remember to feel and to be present for our children.  May we behave in ways that let them know they can talk to us about anything.  And may we never forget to hug them and tell them how much we love them.






A Shattered World

By now, probably many of you have heard about shootings today at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newton, Connecticut.  Reports are that Ryan Lanza killed his father in New Jersey, drove to Sandy Hook school where his mother worked as a kindergarten teacher, opened fire and killed people in the school office, then walked to his mother's classroom, shot her, and then opened fire on her classroom. As of now, reports are that 26 or 27 people are dead, eight adults (including the shooter) and 18 children.

And I remember Habukkuk's complaint from ancient scripture:

How long, Lord, must I call for help,
    but you do not listen?
Or cry out to you, “Violence!”
    but you do not save?
Why do you make me look at injustice?
    Why do you tolerate wrongdoing?
Destruction and violence are before me;
    there is strife, and conflict abounds.
Therefore the law is paralyzed,
    and justice never prevails.
The wicked hem in the righteous,
    so that justice is perverted.

I am sick at heart.  My insides are torn up.  I have a colleague from seminary who shared that her daughter attended Sandy Hook school when she was little, and my colleague volunteered there years ago.  

There is so much to sort out - pain, anger, questions about mental illness, violence in our lives.  And of course, there is the ever-present and nearly unanswerable question: "Why?"

Times like this, like Habbukuk's lament, cause us to struggle to make sense of pain and tragedy.  I'm not sure what to say at the moment - but I do know that I am changing my sermon topic this Sunday, I'll be draping the pulpit in black cloth, doing some readings with the Director of Religious Education, talking about our violent culture, name some of my anger and anguish, and somehow, maybe - mindful of the Roman occupied Mediterranean world a few centuries ago - name some possibilities for peace and presence in the midst of a secular world occuiped by the empire of spiritual illness.

And I know that these times also cause us to look at our families and our loves in a renewed light. Go home and hug your children. Hug the people you love. Spend time together - and on Sunday, spend time with us.

All my love,

-Kent




50 Years Ago...Because it Applies Now

In two days, Minnesotans will vote on whether they want to discriminate against some kinds of love but not others.  Specifically, they will vote on this proposed amendment question:

Shall the Minnesota Constitution be amended to provide that only a union of one man and one woman shall be valid or recognized as a marriage in Minnesota?

Here is a photo I recently found on Facebook that pretty much sums up what this hurtful amendment attempts to do.  Since when do we get to vote on human rights?  A lot of effort had to occur in the south and around the nation in the struggle for civil rights in the 1950s and 1960s, but Alabama and Georgia and Mississippi did not get to vote on whether or not black people could eat at lunch counters or drink from the same water fountain.  This is not a matter of majority opinion as apparently our state thinks it is.  They're called "rights" for a reason.









How Would You Like People to Talk About Your Family?

In this ongoing statewide discussion about the proposed anti-marriage amendment up for a vote next Tuesday, we hear a lot of talk about same-sex couples and their families. And lately, I've even begun hearing ads on the radio about the supposed "negative" effects of same-sex marriage on society in general, and in particular, on the children of same-sex couples.

Tonight I checked out the "Minnesota for Marriage" website, which is the primary group wanting to retain a definition of marriage as "one man and one woman." They spout some pretty misleading stuff.  If same-sex marriage is allowed (in this case in Minnesota), the "paradigm shift" from defining marriage as one man and one woman to defining it as all loving couples:

"says to children that mothers and fathers don't matter (especially fathers) - any two 'parents' will do. It proclaims the false notion that a man can be a mother and a woman can be a father - that men and women are exactly the same in rearing children. And it undermines the marriage culture by making marriage a meaningless political gesture, rather than a child-affirming social construct."

OK, there is so much wrong with this statement that I hardly know where to begin. I've been pretty deeply involved in this struggle to affirm our common humanity among all people, no matter our race, culture, color, religion, social or financial background, sexual orientation, or gender identity, and I have never heard anyone say that in this fight to affirm our common humanity and allow the free expression of love that mothers and fathers don't matter.  In fact, if anything, the exact opposite is true - that loving parenting from either/both fathers and mothers is of ultimate importance.  I'm not at all clear how they seem to think we're saying "especially fathers" don't matter.  Do they not realize that a whole bunch of same-sex parent couples out there are two men?  If two male same-sex parents aren't fathers, then I'm at a complete loss about how to figure out where to begin a conversation.

As to the notion that "any two 'parents' will do," this is just absurd. They seem to forget - or ignore - that opposite-sex and same-sex couples these days (as opposed to those days when marriage was understood to be an exchange of property - that is, the woman being the piece of property), are attracted to each other and decide to commit to each other based on love.  Unbeknownst to the "Minnesotans for Marriage" people, both opposite-sex unions and same-sex unions are based on continuing commitments that are founded in particular humanity: the particularity of specific lovers, their qualities and quirks and passions and attractions.  So no, "any two parents" will not do.  What will do in a loving commitment is love between two people.

I'm also not clear when marriage became a "child-affirming social construct." And yet, those of us who want marriage equality are accused of redefining marriage? Does this mean that an opposite-sex couple who gets married but does not want to have children are also subverting this supposed "child-affirming social construct"? What about an opposite-sex couple who wants children, but biologically/medically aren't able to have them? I thought marriage these days was about love. At least, in my work on marriage equality these past 12 months, that's the assumption I've been working with. 

The Minnesota for Marriage website finishes articulating their position with these words:

"When marriage ceases to have its historic meaning and understanding, over time fewer and fewer people will marry. We will have an inevitable increase in children born out of wedlock, and increase in faithlessness, a resulting increase of female and child poverty, and a higher incidence of all the documented social ills associated with children being raised in a home without their married biological parents.  Ultimately, we as a society all suffer when we fail to nourish a true, thriving marriage culture founded on the truth experienced by virtually every civilization in every nation since the dawn of time - marriage is the union of one man and one woman."

This is a breathtakingly sweeping statement.  My first observation is that most of these "social ills" have already occurred and are documented already with opposite-sex marriages as the dominant practice in the land. Why falsely ascribe them to the rise of same-sex marriage? Somehow, the 24-hour marriage of Brittany Spears is sacred because it involves an opposite-sex couple, but a 30-year long committed and loving relationship with another couple is "immoral" simply because it involves two women or two men?  These days, 50% of "traditional marriages" end in divorce. These days, faithlessness in marriage is already occurring: just ask one of Rush Limbaugh's four wives, or one of Newt Gingrich's three wives, or Rudolph Guiliani's three wives. I pick on these three men not to decry divorce. I am a minister, after all, and I've witnessed the end of many marriages for good reason (growing apart, abuse, infidelity), so I definitely think divorce has a needed and necessary place in our society. My point here is to ask people with the marriage as "one man and one woman" perspective not to ascribe infidelity and divorce to same-sex marriage, and to not be hypocritical by saying divorce is OK when opposite-sex couples do it, but not when same-sex people do it.

I'm also just a little surprised and bewildered that this group says that all these "documented social ills [are] associated with children being raised in a home without their married biological parents."  I think of the many single mothers I know, and the few single fathers I know, who raise their children in loving homes. And I think of the grandparents who raise their grandchildren in a loving home. And I think of the parents who adopt and raise children from around the world, children who otherwise would have a brutal life, or no life at all.  It is at the very least insensitive to the many, many families who raise beautiful and loving children in beautiful, loving homes that don't have "married biological parents."

And of course, marriage "since the dawn of time" has not been the union of one man and one woman.  It sounds nice and appears to be a strong argument, but unfortunately for them, it's just not true.  First, let's take Mitt Romney. His great-grandfather, Helaman Pratt, was a Morman polygamist, and was married to at least three wives.  Then if we go just a little further back, white owners traded and sold their slaves as property, like cattle, in order to "breed" offspring. There was no such thing as "marriage" for slaves (since they were not considered human, how could they get married?). Then a little further back in Medieval times, it was only the wealthy landowners who got married, and for them, most of the time, it was political or to increase landholdings. Unless they were extremely powerful, the women were largely considered part of the property exchange, and the vast majority of the commoners who neither owned land or had money, did not typically get married at all, but simply lived in what we would now call "common law" unions. 

And then, of course, we can go all the way back to the stories in the Hebrew Scriptures, which many on the right who support marriage as "one man and one woman" consider the infallible and historical word of God. A "marriage" in those times consisted of one man and his wives and concubines (Abraham, Nahor, Gideon, King Solomon); a rapist and his victim (Deuteronomy 22:28-29); a male soldier and his prisoner of war (Deuteronomy 21:11-14); and a man plus many women (Lamech, Esau, Gidean, Elkanah, David, Solomon, Rehaboam, etc), among others.

Bottom line: if you want to push for marriage as between one man and one woman, that is your right. But please don't rewrite history to say that this is the way it has been "since the dawn of time."

So I ask you this question: How would you like people to talk about your family? Do you want someone else to define whether or not you had a loving home? Do you want someone else to tell you whether or not your parents were legitimate parents?  Would you want someone else to tell you that your family was immoral and an abomination?  I imagine most of us, no matter how we feel about our own family, would feel just a little bit angry having someone else define our family for us.  So let's not do it to others.

It's about time we hear from the children themselves what they think about being raised with same-sex parents.  Here are just two examples:

Here is a video made by Erin Judge, a married heterosexual woman raised by two mothers:

Here is a video about Zach Wahls, a young man raised in Iowa by two mothers:

And as an added bonus, here is a video of Zach Wahls giving his testimony in Iowa a couple years ago in support of same-sex marriage in that state:

Let's stop the bigotry and hate, and start spreading the love.





Recent Posts

  1. Ann Reed Concert - January 26, 2013
    Sunday, January 27, 2013
  2. Obituary for Charlotte Justice Saleska
    Thursday, January 10, 2013
  3. Getting the Call about Mom
    Friday, January 04, 2013
  4. Set in Stone - by Victoria Safford
    Monday, December 31, 2012
  5. Moving Forward - Finally? Finally!
    Wednesday, December 19, 2012
  6. Talking to my Son about Violence
    Tuesday, December 18, 2012
  7. In the Bleak Midwinter - sermon
    Monday, December 17, 2012
  8. A Shattered World
    Friday, December 14, 2012
  9. 50 Years Ago...Because it Applies Now
    Sunday, November 04, 2012
  10. How Would You Like People to Talk About Your Family?
    Friday, November 02, 2012

Recent Comments

  1. Thriveni Mining in Orissa on What gives us the right to vote on love?
    3/14/2013
  2. Thriveni Mining in Orissa on Phoenix - Day Two (6/20)
    2/14/2013
  3. restaurant in ghaziabad on Phoenix - Day Two (6/20)
    1/29/2013
  4. Christy Dachelet on Obituary for Charlotte Justice Saleska
    1/10/2013
  5. Stephanie McCullough-Cain on All Saints: A Day for All Families
    11/2/2012
  6. Scott Keeler on What gives us the right to vote on love?
    10/31/2012
  7. acrylic frames on Ferris Bueller and Pablo Picasso
    10/18/2012
  8. Cathy on Ferris Bueller and Pablo Picasso
    9/2/2012
  9. Ramadan SMS on UU Fast Day 2012
    7/4/2012
  10. Christy Dachelet on Phoenix - Day Three (6/21)
    6/22/2012

Subscribe